Health and Psychology

Health and psychology

Blog

Mind Set

Posted by Margaret Donohue on May 13, 2011 at 9:30 AM

I did something different.  I decided to write a psychological assessment report directly to a child.  Not about a child.  To them directly.  I'm not sure why I never thought about doing that before or why I thought about it with this specific child.  But it just seems respectful of the child.  After all the child was the one that went through all that evaluation.  In her case it was about three hours on a Sunday.  And it's what I'm going to do from now on when I test a child.  It makes everything clear and treats them as if they have the ability to understand.  The report is shorter, written in kid-friendly language, and tells them what they themselves can do for improving things.  It's just the right thing to do.


It's a mindset.  Last semester I decided to put exams for students on my website.  They can take them as many times as needed until they pass at 100%.  I realized that some students were learning more from taking the tests than they were from the lectures or the readings.  So I decided to change the purpose of the test.  It's to help them clarify the essentials of what they need to learn.  So there are more tests than in most classes and the information is esssential.  I used to get horrific test anxiety.  I threw up before my licensing exams in two states, and the SAT/PSAT exams.  And yes I did well in all of them but it's not an experience I like.  So why not change it?  So I talk to my students as if they are to be my future colleagues, because they are.  I talk to them about what they should expect of themselves as professionals, and what they should expect of their peers as professionals.  It changes how they start to think of themselves.


The same mindset happens when I work with clients.  I have a picture of who they are in the future.  Who they have told me they wish to be. Their best self.  And my interventions are then geared to assist them in reaching that picture.  My job is then to help them remain on tract or notice when they seem to be moving away from what it is they have said they want.


For me it's about ethics.  It's about doing the right thing by someone.  I don't have an ethical perspective that's about law and order and not getting caught doing the wrong thing.  It's not a risk management perspective.  It's about finding out what the right thing is and doing that.  It's a mindset about believing people are willing and able and motivated and wanting to do better.  My professional role then become how to facilitate that.

Categories: Ethics

Post a Comment

Oops!

Oops, you forgot something.

Oops!

The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.

Already a member? Sign In

3 Comments

Reply newport
6:13 AM on August 4, 2011 
Awsome post..

Psychologists claim a stressor is perceived as positive or negative depending on our perception. The amount of stress one experiences from a given stressor also depends on how the stress is perceived. Many factors affect the perception of a stressor. One is the amount of emotional investment one has in the situation. Leaving for work and being unable to locate your umbrella would probably cause less stress than being unable to locate your car. Another factor is previous experience. For example, when your husband tells you he has invited his boss over for dinner at the last minute, you?re more likely to feel extra negative pressure if the last time this happened the evening was a fiasco. If it was instead followed by his getting a promotion, you might feel stressed but look forward to the evening as another opportunity to help your husband advance his career and perhaps as an enjoyable social occasion. We use our memory of prior experiences to process each external stimulus and assign meaning to it. http://www.newportpsychotherapy.com/psychology_topics/stress_happ
iness_psychologist.html
Reply Margaret Donohue
10:59 AM on June 3, 2011 
This came about following my working with another psychologist doing legal cases with adults. In those cases the person often never gets any information about the assessment and the report goes to their attorney. Usually the evaluation process gets caught up in the adversarial nature of the case. In this case the other psychologist and I discussed how to remain objective and respectful of the person being evaluated even though they were on the opposing side of the firm that hired us. So we engaged the person and asked them what they wanted from the evaluation. It radically changed the evaluation atmosphere, elicited greater cooperation than anticipated, and allowed us to provide meaningful data to the attorney that hired us.

The evaluation of this child was then a logical extension of that process.

In working with students I see them as colleagues in training. So I interact with them as I would my peers.

Joanna says...
Thanks for sharing this Dr. Donohue. It's inspiring as a future professional since I have noted in myself a tendency to forget that I actually am an emerging professional and not just some dog in training trying to get my next bone. And that ethics are necessary to ensure that human beings are treated as such, regardless of age, mental 'deficiency,' etc. This perspective is so basic yet so absent it seems!
Reply Joanna
1:31 AM on June 2, 2011 
Thanks for sharing this Dr. Donohue. It's inspiring as a future professional since I have noted in myself a tendency to forget that I actually am an emerging professional and not just some dog in training trying to get my next bone. And that ethics are necessary to ensure that human beings are treated as such, regardless of age, mental 'deficiency,' etc. This perspective is so basic yet so absent it seems!